Tecno Spark 8C vs Oppo Realme C35
VS
Tecno Spark 8C Oppo Realme C35 Here we compared two budget smartphones: the 6.6-inch Tecno Spark 8C (with Unisoc T606) that was released on January 31 2022 against the Oppo Realme C35 which is powered by Unisoc Tiger T616 and came out 1 month after. On this page you will find tests full specs strengths and weaknesses of each of the gadgets.
- Differences
- Review
- Specs
- Benchmarks
- Battery life
- Camera
- Comments
Key differences
An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone Reasons to consider the Tecno Spark 8C- Water-resistant body (IPX2 classification)
- Higher display refresh rate – 90 Hz
- 50% higher pixel density (401 vs 267 PPI)
- Modern USB Type-C port
- Compatible with Wi-Fi 5 wireless networks
- Supports 18W fast charging
- Uses a faster type of memory: LPDDR4X
- 34% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (226K versus 169K)
- Faster storage type - UFS 2.2 versus eMMC 5.1
- 21% faster in single-core GeekBench 5 test: 365 and 301 points
Review
Display Screen quality color accuracy brightness Spark 8C 65 Realme C35 67 Performance CPU/GPU performance in apps and games Spark 8C 21 Realme C35 29 Battery Battery life charging type and speed Spark 8C 70 Realme C35 78 Camera Photo and video recording quality Spark 8C 47 Realme C35 57 Connectivity Networks ports data transmission Spark 8C 56 Realme C35 71 NanoReview score Final comparison evaluation Spark 8C 51 Realme C35 58Value for money
You can enter your local price of these phones (in USD or any other currency) and click on the "Calculate" button to see which one has a better value for money. Tecno Spark 8C Price Oppo Realme C35 CalculateTests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and tests Phone: Spark 8C vs Realme C35Display
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 6.6 inches | 6.6 inches |
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels | 1080 x 2408 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| PPI | 267 ppi | 401 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Max rated brightness | 450 nits | 450 nits |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Screen protection | Tempered glass | Tempered glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83.7% | 84% |
| RGB color space | - | 96% |
| Response time | - | 37 ms |
| Contrast | - | 975:1 |
Design and build
| Height | 164.57 mm (6.48 inches) | 164.4 mm (6.47 inches) |
| Width | 76 mm (2.99 inches) | 75.6 mm (2.98 inches) |
| Thickness | 8.95 mm (0.35 inches) | 8.1 mm (0.32 inches) |
| Weight | 193 gramm (6.81 oz) | 189 gramm (6.67 oz) |
| Waterproof | IPX2 | No |
| Rear material | Plastic | Plastic |
| Frame material | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | Black Gray Green Purple | Black Green |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes rear | Yes in home button |
Performance
Tests of Tecno Spark 8C and Oppo Realme C35 in the benchmarks| Chipset | Unisoc T606 | Unisoc Tiger T616 |
| Max. clock | 1600 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 6 cores at 1.6 GHz: Cortex-A55 - 2 cores at 1.6 GHz: Cortex-A75 | - 6 cores at 1.8 GHz: Cortex-A55 - 2 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A75 |
| L3 cache | 1 MB | - |
| Lithography process | 12 nanometers | 12 nanometers |
| Graphics | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| GPU clock | 650 MHz | 750 MHz |
| RAM size | 2 3 4 GB | 4 6 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR3 | LPDDR4X |
| Channels | 1 | 2 |
| Storage size | 64 GB | 64 128 GB |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
| Memory card max. size | Up to 256 GB | Up to 1024 GB |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 5 (Single-Core) Spark 8C 301 Realme C35 +21% 365 Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core) Spark 8C 1181 Realme C35 +19% 1403 AnTuTu Benchmark 9 Spark 8C 169467 Realme C35 +34% 226857| CPU | 60630 | 71236 |
| GPU | 21826 | 24887 |
| Memory | 38655 | 64760 |
| UX | 48282 | 64509 |
| Total score | 169467 | 226857 |
| PCMark 3.0 score | 7368 | 7948 |
Software
| Operating system | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| ROM | HiOS 7.6 | Realme UI 2.0 |
| OS size | - | 18 GB |
Battery
| Capacity | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Charge power | - | 18 W |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | No | No |
| Fast charging | No | Yes (50% in 60 min) |
| Full charging time | - | 2:12 hr |
Camera
Specs and camera test of smartphones| Matrix | 13 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 4128 x 3096 | 8700 x 5800 |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | Dual LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | No | No |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 30FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| Slow motion | No | - |
| Lenses | 2 (13 MP + 0 MP) | 3 (50 MP + 2 MP + 0.3 MP) |
| Wide (main) lens | - 13 MP - Aperture: f/1.8 - Focal length: 27 mm | - 50 MP - Aperture: f/1.8 - Focal length: 26 mm - Pixel size: 0.64 micron - Sensor: 1/2.76" (CMOS) - Phase autofocus |
| Macro lens | - | - 2 MP - Aperture: f/2.4 |
| Depth lens | Yes | - 0.3 MP - Aperture: f/2.8 |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
| Megapixels | 8 megapixels | 8 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 3264 x 2448 |
| Aperture | - | f/2.0 |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Video resolution | 720p at 30 FPS | 720p at 30 FPS |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5 |
| Bluetooth features | - | LE A2DP |
| USB type | Micro USB | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG | - Charging - USB-Storage mode |
| GPS | GPS Beidou | GPS GLONASS Beidou Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | Depends on the region |
| Infrared port | No | No |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 2 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support* | No | No |
| Hybrid slot | - | No |
| LTE Cat* | 4 | 7 |
| 5G support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Mono | Mono |
| Headphone audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| FM radio | Yes | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Other
| Category | Budget | Budget |
| Announced | January 2022 | February 2022 |
| Release date | February 2022 | February 2022 |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Fingerprint | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data we think that the Oppo Realme C35 is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
So which phone would you choose? Tecno Spark 8C 0 (0%) Oppo Realme C35 0 (0%) Vote Total votes: <, 1Related comparisons
1. Infinix Hot 12 Play vs Tecno Spark 8C 2. Oppo Realme C25 vs Oppo Realme C35 3. Xiaomi Redmi 10 vs Oppo Realme C35 4. Xiaomi Redmi 10C vs Oppo Realme C35 5. Oppo Realme C31 vs Oppo Realme C35User opinions
You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below Name Message Send Sendsource nanoreview.net
Tecno K7 Features And Specifications - From Tecno Spark Series
Tecno Launches Entry-Level POP2F in Pakistan - The Review Master
Introducing Tecno Spot Tecnos Official Online Community
TECNO
Tecno Official Store
TECNO P701 FIRMWARE - Download Firmware Terbaru
TECNO
Tecno Mega
Cerchas de Acero TECNO FRAME
La campa a de Ushuaia para fortalecer el turismo - IMPULSO
Apple iPhone SE 2020 Stock Wallpaper 1242x2688 - 11
Desde Mendoza L-Gante present su vino del Valle de Uco Tinty 420
Los mejores lugares de Noruega para ver las auroras boreales
Fall Phone Wallpaper - 053
Whatsapp Wallpaper 006