Samsung Galaxy A32 Vs Google Pixel 6a

Samsung Galaxy A32 vs Google Pixel 6a

Самсунг Галакси А32 4G VS Гугл Пиксель 6а Samsung Galaxy A32 Google Pixel 6a

Here we compared two smartphones: the 6.4-inch Samsung Galaxy A32 (with Mediatek Helio G80) that was released on February 25 2021 against the Google Pixel 6a which is powered by Google Tensor and came out 15 months after. On this page you will find tests full specs strengths and weaknesses of each of the gadgets.

  1. Differences
  2. Review
  3. Specs
  4. Benchmarks
  5. Battery life
  6. Camera
  7. Comments

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy A32
  • Higher display refresh rate – 90 Hz
  • Shows 8% longer battery life (35:02 vs 32:23 hours)
  • Expandable storage via MicroSD card up to 1024GB
  • Has a 0.3 inch larger screen size
  • Comes with 590 mAh larger battery capacity: 5000 vs 4410 mAh
  • Has 2 SIM card slots
  • Includes a 3.5 mm headphone audio jack port
Reasons to consider the Google Pixel 6a
  • Waterproof body (IP67 classification)
  • 2.6x better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (590K versus 223K)
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v5.2)
  • Optical image stabilization
  • Ability to record video in 4K resolution
  • More energy-efficient CPU – Google Tensor
  • Uses a faster type of memory: LPDDR5
  • Stereo speakers
  • The phone is 1-year and 3-months newer
  • More recent OS version: Android 13 versus 12
  • Slow-motion recording at 240FPS
  • Ready for eSIM technology

Review

Display Screen quality color accuracy brightness Galaxy A32 77 Pixel 6a 80 Performance CPU/GPU performance in apps and games Galaxy A32 31 Pixel 6a 68 Battery Battery life charging type and speed Galaxy A32 80 Pixel 6a 78 Camera Photo and video recording quality Galaxy A32 58 Pixel 6a 69 Connectivity Networks ports data transmission Galaxy A32 73 Pixel 6a 85 NanoReview score Final comparison evaluation Galaxy A32 61 Pixel 6a 74

Value for money

You can enter your local price of these phones (in USD or any other currency) and click on the "Calculate" button to see which one has a better value for money. Samsung Galaxy A32 Price Google Pixel 6a Calculate

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests Phone: Galaxy A32 vs Pixel 6a

Display

Type Super AMOLED OLED
Size 6.4 inches 6.1 inches
Resolution 1080 x 2400 pixels 1080 x 2400 pixels
Aspect ratio 20:9 20:9
PPI 411 ppi 429 ppi
Refresh rate 90 Hz 60 Hz
Max rated brightness 800 nits 500 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR - 800 nits
HDR support No Yes HDR10+
Screen protection Corning Gorilla Glass 5 Corning Gorilla Glass 3
Screen-to-body ratio 84.6% 83%
Display features - Always-On Display - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display
Display tests
RGB color space - 96.9%
PWM - 240 Hz
Response time - 3 ms
Contrast - ∞ Infinity
Peak brightness test (auto) Galaxy A32 821 nits Pixel 6a +7% 882 nits Sources: NotebookCheck [3]

Design and build

Height 158.9 mm (6.26 inches) 152.2 mm (5.99 inches)
Width 73.6 mm (2.9 inches) 71.8 mm (2.83 inches)
Thickness 8.4 mm (0.33 inches) 8.9 mm (0.35 inches)
Weight 184 gramm (6.49 oz) 178 gramm (6.28 oz)
Waterproof No IP67
Rear material Plastic Plastic
Frame material Plastic Metal
Colors White Black Blue Purple White Black Green
Fingerprint scanner Yes in-display Yes in-display
Screen-to-body ratio Galaxy A32 +2% 84.6% Pixel 6a 83%

Performance

Tests of Samsung Galaxy A32 and Google Pixel 6a in the benchmarks
SoC
Chipset Mediatek Helio G80 Google Tensor
Max. clock 2000 MHz 2800 MHz
CPU cores 8 (2 + 6) 8 (2 + 2 + 4)
Architecture - 6 cores at 1.8 GHz: Cortex-A55 - 2 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A75 - 4 cores at 1.8 GHz: Cortex A55 - 2 cores at 2.25 GHz: Cortex A76 - 2 cores at 2.8 GHz: Cortex-X1
L3 cache - 4 MB
Lithography process 12 nanometers 5 nanometers
Graphics Mali-G52 MP2 Mali-G78 MP20
GPU clock 950 MHz 848 MHz
FLOPS ~54.6 GFLOPS ~2171 GFLOPS
Memory
RAM size 4 6 8 GB 6 GB
Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR5
Memory clock 1866 MHz -
Channels 2 2
Storage
Storage size 64 128 GB 128 GB
Storage type eMMC 5.1 UFS 3.1
Memory card MicroSD No
Memory card max. size Up to 1024 GB -

Benchmarks

Geekbench 5 (Single-Core) Galaxy A32 350 Pixel 6a +200% 1049 Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core) Galaxy A32 1287 Pixel 6a +125% 2891 AnTuTu Benchmark 9 Galaxy A32 223187 Pixel 6a +165% 590381
CPU 65278 174782
GPU 56558 200680
Memory 36467 84939
UX 62688 125999
Total score 223187 590381
3DMark Wild Life Performance Galaxy A32 n/a Pixel 6a 6058
Stability - 55%
Graphics test - 36 FPS
Graphics score - 6058
PCMark 3.0 score - 9691
AnTuTu Benchmark Android Rating Sources: 3DMark [3] ▶️ Submit your AnTuTu result

Software

Operating system Android 11 (Can be upgraded to Android 12) Android 12 (Can be upgraded to Android 13)
ROM One UI 4.1 Stock Android
OS size 18.6 GB 18 GB

Battery

Specifications
Capacity 5000 mAh 4410 mAh
Charge power 15 W 18 W
Battery type Li-Ion Li-Po
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging No No
Reverse charging No No
Fast charging Yes (25% in 30 min) Yes (42% in 30 min)
Full charging time 2:19 hr 1:51 hr
Battery life tests
Web browsing 12:46 hr 11:03 hr
Watching video 14:17 hr 16:44 hr
Gaming 06:20 hr 06:15 hr
Standby 115 hr 91 hr
General battery life Galaxy A32 +8% 35:02 hr Pixel 6a 32:23 hr Phone Battery Life Ranking (95th and 148th place)

Camera

Specs and camera test of smartphones
Main camera
Matrix 64 megapixels 12.2 megapixels
Image resolution 9216 x 6912 -
Zoom Digital Digital
Flash LED Dual LED
Stabilization Digital Optical
8K video recording No No
4K video recording No Up to 60FPS
1080p video recording Up to 30FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 120 FPS (720p) 240 FPS (1080p)
Angle of widest lens 123° 114°
Lenses 4 (64 MP + 8 MP + 5 MP + 5 MP) 2 (12.2 MP + 12 MP)
Wide (main) lens - 64 MP - Aperture: f/1.8 - Phase autofocus - 12.2 MP - Aperture: f/1.7 - Focal length: 27 mm - Pixel size: 1.4 micron - Sensor: 1/2.55" Sony IMX363 (Exmor-RS CMOS) - Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) - Optical stabilization
Ultra-wide lens - 8 MP - Aperture: f/2.2 - Focal length: 13 mm - Pixel size: 1.12 micron - Sensor: 1/4.0" (CMOS) - 12 MP - Aperture: f/2.2 - Focal length: 17 mm - Pixel size: 1.12 micron - Sensor: 1/2.9" Sony IMX386 (Exmor-RS CMOS)
Macro lens - 5 MP - Aperture: f/2.4 -
Depth lens - 5 MP - Aperture: f/2.4 -
Camera features - Bokeh mode - Pro mode - Bokeh mode - Pro mode
Samples - Photo samples of Google Pixel 6a from DxOMark
Selfie camera
Megapixels 20 megapixels 8 megapixels
Image resolution 5380 x 3620 3840 x 2160
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.0
Focal length - 24 mm
Pixel size - 1.12 microns
Sensor type CMOS Exmor-RS CMOS
Sensor size - 1/2.8"
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS

DxOMark camera tests

Photo quality Galaxy A32 n/a Pixel 6a 140 Video quality Galaxy A32 n/a Pixel 6a 111 Generic camera score Galaxy A32 n/a Pixel 6a 130

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5 5.2
Bluetooth features PBAP/PAB PAN OPP MAP HSP HID HFP DIP AVRCP A2DP LE A2DP
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 3.1
USB features - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG
GPS GPS GLONASS Beidou Galileo GPS GLONASS Beidou Galileo QZSS
NFC* No Yes
Infrared port No No
Network
Number of SIM* 2 1
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby -
eSIM support* No Yes
Hybrid slot No No
LTE Cat* 12 20
5G support No Yes

Sound

Speakers Mono Stereo
Headphone audio jack Yes No
FM radio Yes No
Dolby Atmos Yes Yes
Speakers test Max. loudness Galaxy A32 n/a Pixel 6a 87.4 dB

Other

Category Mid-range Flagship
Announced February 2021 May 2022
Release date February 2021 June 2022
SAR (head) 0.45 W/kg -
SAR (body) 1.3 W/kg -
Sensors - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint - Barometer - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint
*Disclaimer! NFC GSM network support and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

After analyzing all the data we think that the Google Pixel 6a is definitely a better buy.

Cast your vote

So which phone would you choose? Samsung Galaxy A32 2 (33.3%) Google Pixel 6a 4 (66.7%) Vote Total votes: 6

Related comparisons

1. Samsung Galaxy A51 or Galaxy A32 2. Samsung Galaxy A52 or Galaxy A32 3. Samsung Galaxy A23 or Galaxy A32 4. Samsung Galaxy M32 or Galaxy A32 5. Samsung Galaxy S20 or Google Pixel 6a 6. Apple iPhone 11 or Google Pixel 6a 7. Google Pixel 6 or Pixel 6a 8. Samsung Galaxy S22 or Google Pixel 6a 9. Google Pixel 4 or Pixel 6a

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below Name Message Send Send

source nanoreview.net


Android Samsung Wallpapers - Wallpaper Cave
Android Samsung Wallpapers - Wallpaper Cave


 Samsung Refrigerators 4 door with touch screen
Samsung Refrigerators 4 door with touch screen


Blur Phone Wallpaper 1080x2340 - 111
Blur Phone Wallpaper 1080x2340 - 111


UnBricking TV by EEPROM Reset - SamyGO
UnBricking TV by EEPROM Reset - SamyGO


25 amazing Italian bathroom tile designs ideas and pictures 2020
25 amazing Italian bathroom tile designs ideas and pictures 2020


 Samsung Galaxy A32 Wallpapers HD
Samsung Galaxy A32 Wallpapers HD


 Samsung Wave 723 Hintergrundbilder
Samsung Wave 723 Hintergrundbilder


2014 Most Beautiful Object in South Africa Design Indaba
2014 Most Beautiful Object in South Africa Design Indaba




Oppo Realme Gt Neo 2t Vs Gt Master Edition

Oppo Realme GT Neo 2T vs GT Master Edition

Оппо Реалми GT Нео 2Т VS Оппо Реалми GT Master Edition Oppo Realme GT Neo 2T Oppo Realme GT Master Edition

Here we compared two mid-range smartphones: the 6.43-inch Oppo Realme GT Neo 2T (with MediaTek Dimensity 1200 5G) that was released on October 19 2021 against the Oppo Realme GT Master Edition which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 778 5G and came out 3 months before. On this page you will find tests full specs strengths and weaknesses of each of the gadgets.

  1. Differences
  2. Review
  3. Specs
  4. Benchmarks
  5. Battery life
  6. Camera
  7. Comments

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone Reasons to consider the Oppo Realme GT Neo 2T
  • 29% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (711K versus 553K)
  • Stereo speakers
  • Faster storage type - UFS 3.1 versus UFS 2.2
  • Reverse charging feature
  • 26% faster in single-core GeekBench 5 test: 1006 and 798 points
Reasons to consider the Oppo Realme GT Master Edition
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v5.2)

Review

Display Screen quality color accuracy brightness Realme GT Neo 2T 87 Realme GT Master Edition 84 Performance CPU/GPU performance in apps and games Realme GT Neo 2T 77 Realme GT Master Edition 61 Battery Battery life charging type and speed Realme GT Neo 2T 80 Realme GT Master Edition 76 Camera Photo and video recording quality Realme GT Neo 2T 64 Realme GT Master Edition 61 Connectivity Networks ports data transmission Realme GT Neo 2T 86 Realme GT Master Edition 87 NanoReview score Final comparison evaluation Realme GT Neo 2T 76 Realme GT Master Edition 70

Value for money

You can enter your local price of these phones (in USD or any other currency) and click on the "Calculate" button to see which one has a better value for money. Oppo Realme GT Neo 2T Price Oppo Realme GT Master Edition Calculate

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests Phone: Realme GT Neo 2T vs Realme GT Master Edition

Display

Type AMOLED Super AMOLED
Size 6.43 inches 6.43 inches
Resolution 1080 x 2400 pixels 1080 x 2400 pixels
Aspect ratio 20:9 20:9
PPI 409 ppi 402 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Max rated brightness 500 nits 630 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 1000 nits 1000 nits
HDR support Yes HDR10+ Yes HDR10
Screen protection Tempered glass Tempered glass
Screen-to-body ratio 85.9% 85.3%
Display features - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming
Display tests
RGB color space - 100%
PWM - 245 Hz
Response time - 7 ms
Contrast - ∞ Infinity
Peak brightness test (auto) Realme GT Neo 2T n/a Realme GT Master Edition 636 nits Sources: NotebookCheck [3]

Design and build

Height 158.5 mm (6.24 inches) 159.2 mm (6.27 inches)
Width 73.3 mm (2.89 inches) 73.5 mm (2.89 inches)
Thickness 8.4 mm (0.33 inches) 8.7 mm (0.34 inches)
Weight 186 gramm (6.56 oz) 174 gramm (6.14 oz)
Waterproof No No
Rear material Glass Plastic
Frame material Plastic Plastic
Colors White Black White Black Gray
Fingerprint scanner Yes in-display Yes in-display
Screen-to-body ratio Realme GT Neo 2T +1% 85.9% Realme GT Master Edition 85.3%

Performance

Tests of Oppo Realme GT Neo 2T and Oppo Realme GT Master Edition in the benchmarks
SoC
Chipset MediaTek Dimensity 1200 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 778 5G
Max. clock 3000 MHz 2400 MHz
CPU cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 8 (1 + 3 + 4)
Architecture - 4 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A55 - 3 cores at 2.6 GHz: Cortex-A78 - 1 core at 3 GHz: Cortex-A78 - 4 cores at 1.9 GHz: Kryo 670 Silver (Cortex-A55) - 3 cores at 2.2 GHz: Kryo 670 Gold (Cortex-A78) - 1 core at 2.4 GHz: Kryo 670 Prime (Cortex-A78)
Lithography process 6 nanometers 6 nanometers
Graphics Mali-G77 MC9 Adreno 642L
GPU clock 886 MHz 490 MHz
Memory
RAM size 8 12 GB 6 8 GB
Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory clock 2133 MHz 2133 MHz
Channels 2 2
Storage
Storage size 128 256 GB 128 256 GB
Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 2.2
Memory card No No

Benchmarks

Geekbench 5 (Single-Core) Realme GT Neo 2T +26% 1006 Realme GT Master Edition 798 Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core) Realme GT Neo 2T +26% 3585 Realme GT Master Edition 2836 AnTuTu Benchmark 9 Realme GT Neo 2T +29% 711700 Realme GT Master Edition 553320
CPU 178467 161810
GPU 244048 158929
Memory 133574 97977
UX 150992 133155
Total score 711700 553320
3DMark Wild Life Performance Realme GT Neo 2T +67% 4166 Realme GT Master Edition 2494
Stability 98% 98%
Graphics test 24 FPS 14 FPS
Graphics score 4166 2494
PCMark 3.0 score 15627 12639
AnTuTu 9 Ranking Sources: 3DMark [3] [4] ▶️ Submit your AnTuTu result

Software

Operating system Android 11 (Can be upgraded to Android 12) Android 11 (Can be upgraded to Android 12)
ROM Realme UI 3.0 Realme UI 2.0
OS size 11.5 GB 16 GB

Battery

Specifications
Capacity 4500 mAh 4300 mAh
Charge power 65 W 65 W
Battery type Li-Ion Li-Po
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging No No
Reverse charging Yes No
Fast charging Yes (50% in 15 min) Yes (50% in 15 min)
Full charging time 0:35 hr 0:31 hr
Battery life tests
Web browsing - 10:05 hr
Watching video - 16:28 hr
Gaming - 05:11 hr
Standby - 99 hr
General battery life Realme GT Neo 2T n/a Realme GT Master Edition 31:41 hr

Camera

Specs and camera test of smartphones
Main camera
Matrix 64 megapixels 64 megapixels
Image resolution 9280 x 6920 9280 x 6920
Zoom Digital Digital
Flash Dual LED LED
Stabilization Digital Digital
8K video recording No No
4K video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 30FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 480 FPS (1080p) -
Angle of widest lens 120° 119°
Lenses 3 (64 MP + 8 MP + 2 MP) 3 (64 MP + 8 MP + 2 MP)
Wide (main) lens - 64 MP - Aperture: f/1.8 - Focal length: 26 mm - Pixel size: 0.8 micron - Sensor: 1/1.7" Sony IMX682 (Exmor-RS CMOS) - Phase autofocus - 64 MP - Aperture: f/1.8 - Focal length: 25 mm - Pixel size: 0.7 micron - Sensor: 1/2" Omnivision OV64B (CMOS) - Phase autofocus
Ultra-wide lens - 8 MP - Aperture: f/2.3 - Focal length: 16 mm - 8 MP - Aperture: f/2.2 - Pixel size: 1.14 micron - Sensor: 1/2.8" Sony IMX355 (Exmor-RS CMOS)
Macro lens - 2 MP - Aperture: f/2.4 - 2 MP - Aperture: f/2.4 - Pixel size: 1.75 micron - Sensor: 1/5" Omnivision OV02B10 (CMOS)
Camera features - Bokeh mode - Pro mode - Bokeh mode - Pro mode
Selfie camera
Megapixels 16 megapixels 32 megapixels
Image resolution 4920 x 3264 6528 x 4896
Aperture f/2.5 f/2.5
Focal length 26 mm -
Pixel size 1 microns 0.8 microns
Sensor type Exmor-RS CMOS Exmor-RS CMOS
Sensor size 1/3.13" 1/2.74"
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.1 5.2
Bluetooth features LE A2DP LE A2DP
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG
GPS GPS GLONASS Beidou Galileo QZSS NAVIC GPS GLONASS Beidou Galileo QZSS
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port No No
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* No No
Hybrid slot No No
LTE Cat* - 20
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Mono
Headphone audio jack Yes Yes
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes Yes
Speakers test Max. loudness Realme GT Neo 2T n/a Realme GT Master Edition 84.9 dB

Other

Category Mid-range Mid-range
Announced October 2021 July 2021
Release date November 2021 July 2021
Sensors - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint
*Disclaimer! NFC GSM network support and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

After analyzing all the data we think that the Oppo Realme GT Neo 2T is definitely a better buy.

Cast your vote

So which phone would you choose? Oppo Realme GT Neo 2T 94 (91.3%) Oppo Realme GT Master Edition 9 (8.7%) Vote Total votes: 103

Related comparisons

1. Realme GT Neo 2T vs Poco X3 Pro 2. Realme GT Neo 2T vs Realme 9 Pro Plus 3. Realme GT Neo 2T vs Realme GT Neo 4. Realme GT Neo 2T vs Poco X4 GT 5. Realme GT Master Edition vs Poco X4 Pro 5G 6. Realme GT Master Edition vs Realme GT Neo 2 7. Realme GT Master Edition vs Realme 9 Pro Plus 8. Realme GT Master Edition vs Realme GT Neo 3T

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below Name Message Send Send

source nanoreview.net


 Oppo
Oppo


 OPPO R2001 Stock ROM OFFICIAL FIRMWARE
OPPO R2001 Stock ROM OFFICIAL FIRMWARE


 Oppo going to release their foldable phone next February
Oppo going to release their foldable phone next February


The Magic of Oppo The Brand That Does It All - Audio Affair Blog
The Magic of Oppo The Brand That Does It All - Audio Affair Blog


 Oppo is expected to launch the Find 9 on Friday September 19
Oppo is expected to launch the Find 9 on Friday September 19


Global Smartphone giant OPPO Mobile expands to Nigeria - Ventures Africa
Global Smartphone giant OPPO Mobile expands to Nigeria - Ventures Africa


 oppo
oppo


 OPPO
OPPO


1170x2532 Wallpaper - 070
1170x2532 Wallpaper - 070


Whatsapp Chat Wallpaper - 222
Whatsapp Chat Wallpaper - 222


 -
-


Huawei Magazine Wallpaper 223 - 1080x2280
Huawei Magazine Wallpaper 223 - 1080x2280


1170x2532 Wallpaper - 097
1170x2532 Wallpaper - 097


 S10 -
S10 -


Beautiful Bedroom Wallpapers 37 - 1920 x 1080
Beautiful Bedroom Wallpapers 37 - 1920 x 1080




Tecno Camon 19 Pro Vs Infinix Zero Ultra

Tecno Camon 19 Pro vs Infinix Zero Ultra

Текно Камон 19 Про VS Инфиникс Зеро Ультра Tecno Camon 19 Pro Infinix Zero Ultra

Here we compared two smartphones: the 6.8-inch Tecno Camon 19 Pro (with MediaTek Helio G96) that was released on June 15 2022 against the Infinix Zero Ultra which is powered by MediaTek Dimensity 920 and came out 4 months after. On this page you will find tests full specs strengths and weaknesses of each of the gadgets.

  1. Differences
  2. Review
  3. Specs
  4. Benchmarks
  5. Battery life
  6. Camera
  7. Comments

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone Reasons to consider the Tecno Camon 19 Pro
  • The rear camera has a 2x optical zoom
  • Comes with 500 mAh larger battery capacity: 5000 vs 4500 mAh
  • Includes a 3.5 mm headphone audio jack port
Reasons to consider the Infinix Zero Ultra
  • 42% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (492K versus 347K)
  • Compatible with the latest Wi-Fi 6 wireless networks
  • More energy-efficient CPU – MediaTek Dimensity 920
  • Uses a faster type of memory: LPDDR5
  • Ability to record video in 4K resolution
  • Has an ultra-wide angle camera lens
  • AMOLED display (versus competitor's IPS LCD)
  • Faster storage type - UFS 3.1 versus UFS 2.1
  • 57% faster in single-core GeekBench 5 test: 810 and 516 points

Review

Display Screen quality color accuracy brightness Camon 19 Pro 79 Zero Ultra 89 Performance CPU/GPU performance in apps and games Camon 19 Pro 42 Zero Ultra 57 Battery Battery life charging type and speed Camon 19 Pro 79 Zero Ultra 80 Camera Photo and video recording quality Camon 19 Pro 70 Zero Ultra 73 Connectivity Networks ports data transmission Camon 19 Pro 77 Zero Ultra 84 NanoReview score Final comparison evaluation Camon 19 Pro 66 Zero Ultra 74

Value for money

You can enter your local price of these phones (in USD or any other currency) and click on the "Calculate" button to see which one has a better value for money. Tecno Camon 19 Pro Price Infinix Zero Ultra Calculate

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests Phone: Camon 19 Pro vs Zero Ultra

Display

Type IPS LCD AMOLED
Size 6.8 inches 6.8 inches
Resolution 1080 x 2460 pixels 1080 x 2400 pixels
Aspect ratio 20.5:9 20:9
PPI 395 ppi 387 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Max rated brightness 480 nits 500 nits
HDR support No -
Screen protection Tempered glass Tempered glass
Screen-to-body ratio 88.2% 90.5%
Display features - - DCI-P3
Peak brightness test (auto) Camon 19 Pro 481 nits Zero Ultra n/a

Design and build

Height 166.79 mm (6.57 inches) 165.5 mm (6.52 inches)
Width 74.55 mm (2.94 inches) 74.5 mm (2.93 inches)
Thickness 8.58 mm (0.34 inches) 9.16 mm (0.36 inches)
Weight 204 gramm (7.2 oz) 213 gramm (7.51 oz)
Waterproof No -
Rear material Plastic Glass
Frame material Plastic Plastic
Colors Black Blue Black Silver
Fingerprint scanner Yes in home button Yes in-display
Screen-to-body ratio Camon 19 Pro 88.2% Zero Ultra +3% 90.5%

Performance

Tests of Tecno Camon 19 Pro and Infinix Zero Ultra in the benchmarks
SoC
Chipset MediaTek Helio G96 MediaTek Dimensity 920
Max. clock 2050 MHz 2500 MHz
CPU cores 8 (2 + 6) 8 (2 + 6)
Architecture - 6 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A55 - 2 cores at 2.05 GHz: Cortex-A76 - 6 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A55 - 2 cores at 2.5 GHz: Cortex-A78
L3 cache - 2 MB
Lithography process 12 nanometers 6 nanometers
Graphics Mali G57 MC2 Mali-G68 MC4
GPU clock 950 MHz 950 MHz
FLOPS - ~684 GFLOPS
Memory
RAM size 8 GB 8 GB
Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR5
Channels 2 -
Storage
Storage size 128 256 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 2.1 UFS 3.1
Memory card MicroSD -
Memory card max. size Up to 1024 GB -

Benchmarks

Geekbench 5 (Single-Core) Camon 19 Pro 516 Zero Ultra +57% 810 Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core) Camon 19 Pro 1746 Zero Ultra +31% 2285 AnTuTu Benchmark 9 Camon 19 Pro 347599 Zero Ultra +42% 492369
CPU 90492 -
GPU 83318 -
Memory 68307 -
UX 102996 -
Total score 347599 492369
3DMark Wild Life Performance Camon 19 Pro 1181 Zero Ultra +94% 2293
Stability 99% 99%
Graphics test 7 FPS 13 FPS
Graphics score 1181 2293
PCMark 3.0 score 9204 12752
Sources: 3DMark [3] [4] ▶️ Submit your AnTuTu result

Software

Operating system Android 12 Android 12
ROM HIOS 8.6 XOS 12

Battery

Specifications
Capacity 5000 mAh 4500 mAh
Charge power 33 W 180 W
Battery type Li-Po Li-Po
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging No No
Reverse charging No No
Fast charging Yes (47% in 30 min) Yes (50% in 5 min)
Full charging time 1:28 hr 0:12 hr
Battery life tests
Web browsing 11:21 hr -
Watching video 13:31 hr -
Gaming 05:51 hr -
Standby 127 hr -
General battery life Camon 19 Pro 34:12 hr Zero Ultra n/a Phones With Long Battery Life

Camera

Specs and camera test of smartphones
Main camera
Matrix 64 megapixels 200 megapixels
Image resolution 9000 x 6000 16384 x 12288
Zoom Optical 2x Digital
Flash Quad LED Dual LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording No No
4K video recording No Up to 30FPS
1080p video recording Up to 30FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion - 960 FPS (720p)
Lenses 3 (64 MP + 50 MP + 2 MP) 3 (200 MP + 13 MP + 2 MP)
Wide (main) lens - 64 MP - Aperture: f/1.6 - Focal length: 26 mm - Pixel size: 0.8 micron - Sensor: 1/1.7" Samsung S5KGWB (ISOCELL Plus CMOS) - Laser autofocus - Optical stabilization - 200 MP - Aperture: f/2.0 - Sensor: 1/1.22" Samsung ISOCELL HP1 (ISOCELL CMOS) - Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) - Optical stabilization
Telephoto lens - 50 MP - Aperture: f/2.0 - Focal length: 50 mm - Pixel size: 0.64 micron - Sensor: 1/2.76" Samsung S5KJN1 (ISOCELL Plus CMOS) - Phase autofocus -
Ultra-wide lens - - 13 MP - Aperture: f/2.4
Depth lens - 2 MP - Aperture: f/2.4 - 2 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode - Pro mode - Bokeh mode - Pro mode
Selfie camera
Megapixels 32 megapixels 32 megapixels
Image resolution - 6528 x 4896
Aperture f/2.4 -
Focal length 26 mm -
Pixel size 0.8 microns -
Sensor type ISOCELL CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/3.4" -
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5 5
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG
GPS GPS GLONASS Beidou Galileo GPS GLONASS Beidou Galileo
NFC* Depends on the region -
Infrared port No No
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* No No
Hybrid slot No No
LTE Cat* - 18
5G support No Yes

Sound

Speakers Mono -
Headphone audio jack Yes No
FM radio Yes Yes
Dolby Atmos No -

Other

Category Mid-range Flagship
Announced June 2022 October 2022
Release date July 2022 October 2022
Sensors - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Fingerprint - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint
*Disclaimer! NFC GSM network support and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

After analyzing all the data we think that the Infinix Zero Ultra is definitely a better buy.

Cast your vote

So which phone would you choose? Tecno Camon 19 Pro 0 (0%) Infinix Zero Ultra 0 (0%) Vote Total votes: <, 1

Related comparisons

1. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro or Tecno Camon 19 Pro 2. Infinix Zero X Pro or Tecno Camon 19 Pro 3. Tecno Pova 3 or Tecno Camon 19 Pro 4. Infinix Note 12 Pro or Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5. Tecno Camon 19 Neo or Tecno Camon 19 Pro 6. Infinix Zero X Pro or Infinix Zero Ultra 7. Infinix Note 12 VIP or Infinix Zero Ultra 8. Infinix Note 12 Pro 5G or Infinix Zero Ultra 9. Infinix Zero 20 or Infinix Zero Ultra

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below Name Message Send Send

source nanoreview.net


How To Check If Your Tecno Phone Or Battery Is Original Or Fake kikitek
How To Check If Your Tecno Phone Or Battery Is Original Or Fake kikitek


Top 10 Smartphones in the Philippines for December 2020 Pinoy Techno
Top 10 Smartphones in the Philippines for December 2020 Pinoy Techno


 Tecno Mobiles - Tecno mobile prices in Pakistan
Tecno Mobiles - Tecno mobile prices in Pakistan


 Tecno IN2 USB Driver SP flash tool - World Wide News - Android USB Driver
Tecno IN2 USB Driver SP flash tool - World Wide News - Android USB Driver


Nairalanders tear TECNO phones apart but TECNO fans won t have it
Nairalanders tear TECNO phones apart but TECNO fans won t have it


 tecno - YouTube
tecno - YouTube


 Tecno - JungleKey com Wiki
Tecno - JungleKey com Wiki


 TECNO - YouTube
TECNO - YouTube


Download Tecno Mobile Phones Firmware Stock Rom Scatter File
Download Tecno Mobile Phones Firmware Stock Rom Scatter File


Foto - tecno
Foto - tecno


Huawei P50 Pro Stock Wallpaper - 10
Huawei P50 Pro Stock Wallpaper - 10


Huawei Magazine Wallpaper 091 - 1440x2560
Huawei Magazine Wallpaper 091 - 1440x2560


Waves Phone Wallpaper 039 - 1080x2340
Waves Phone Wallpaper 039 - 1080x2340


Fall Phone Wallpaper - 008
Fall Phone Wallpaper - 008


Cloud Phone Wallpaper 1440x2560 - 014
Cloud Phone Wallpaper 1440x2560 - 014


Autumn Phone Wallpaper - 062
Autumn Phone Wallpaper - 062


Aesthetic Mobile Wallpaper 909x1920 - 024
Aesthetic Mobile Wallpaper 909x1920 - 024




Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5g Vs Poco F3

Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G vs Poco F3

Ксиаоми Поко X4 Pro 5G VS Ксиаоми Поко F3 Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G Xiaomi Poco F3

Here we compared two smartphones: the 6.67-inch Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 695) that was released on February 28 2022 against the Xiaomi Poco F3 which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G and came out 11 months before. On this page you will find tests full specs strengths and weaknesses of each of the gadgets.

  1. Differences
  2. Review
  3. Specs
  4. Benchmarks
  5. Battery life
  6. Camera
  7. Comments

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G
  • Expandable storage via MicroSD card up to 1024GB
  • Comes with 480 mAh larger battery capacity: 5000 vs 4520 mAh
  • The phone is 11-months newer
  • Includes a 3.5 mm headphone audio jack port
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Poco F3
  • 73% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (703K versus 405K)
  • Compatible with the latest Wi-Fi 6 wireless networks
  • Slow-motion recording at 960FPS
  • Uses a faster type of memory: LPDDR5 2750 MHz
  • Ability to record video in 4K resolution
  • Faster storage type - UFS 3.1 versus UFS 2.2
  • 46% faster in single-core GeekBench 5 test: 1010 and 692 points

Review

Display Screen quality color accuracy brightness Poco X4 Pro 5G 83 Poco F3 84 Performance CPU/GPU performance in apps and games Poco X4 Pro 5G 50 Poco F3 76 Battery Battery life charging type and speed Poco X4 Pro 5G 79 Poco F3 75 Camera Photo and video recording quality Poco X4 Pro 5G 56 Poco F3 64 Connectivity Networks ports data transmission Poco X4 Pro 5G 77 Poco F3 86 NanoReview score Final comparison evaluation Poco X4 Pro 5G 68 Poco F3 75

Value for money

You can enter your local price of these phones (in USD or any other currency) and click on the "Calculate" button to see which one has a better value for money. Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G Price Xiaomi Poco F3 Calculate

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests Phone: Poco X4 Pro 5G vs Poco F3

Display

Type AMOLED AMOLED
Size 6.67 inches 6.67 inches
Resolution 1080 x 2400 pixels 1080 x 2400 pixels
Aspect ratio 20:9 20:9
PPI 395 ppi 395 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Max rated brightness 700 nits 700 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR - 1300 nits
HDR support No Yes HDR10+
Screen protection Corning Gorilla Glass 5 Corning Gorilla Glass 5
Screen-to-body ratio 86% 85.9%
Display features - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display
Display tests
RGB color space 89.4% 99.8%
PWM 479 Hz 490 Hz
Response time 1 ms 3 ms
Contrast ∞ Infinity ∞ Infinity
Peak brightness test (auto) Poco X4 Pro 5G +5% 754 nits Poco F3 717 nits Sources: NotebookCheck [3] [4]

Design and build

Height 164.19 mm (6.46 inches) 163.7 mm (6.44 inches)
Width 76.1 mm (3 inches) 76.4 mm (3.01 inches)
Thickness 8.12 mm (0.32 inches) 7.8 mm (0.31 inches)
Weight 205 gramm (7.23 oz) 196 gramm (6.91 oz)
Waterproof IP53 IP53
Rear material Glass Glass
Frame material Plastic Plastic
Colors Black Blue Yellow White Black Blue
Fingerprint scanner Yes in home button Yes in home button
Screen-to-body ratio Poco X4 Pro 5G 86% Poco F3 85.9%

Performance

Tests of Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G and Xiaomi Poco F3 in the benchmarks
SoC
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
Max. clock 2200 MHz 3200 MHz
CPU cores 8 (2 + 6) 8 (1 + 3 + 4)
Architecture - 6 cores at 1.7 GHz: Kryo 660 Silver (Cortex-A55) - 2 cores at 2.2 GHz: Kryo 660 Gold (Cortex-A78) - 4 cores at 1.8 GHz: Kryo 585 Silver (Cortex-A55) - 3 cores at 2.42 GHz: Kryo 585 Gold (Cortex-A77) - 1 core at 3.2 GHz: Kryo 585 Prime (Cortex-A77)
L3 cache - 4 MB
Lithography process 6 nanometers 7 nanometers
Graphics Adreno 619 Adreno 650
GPU clock 840 MHz 675 MHz
FLOPS ~536 GFLOPS ~1372 GFLOPS
Memory
RAM size 6 8 GB 6 8 GB
Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR5
Memory clock 2133 MHz 2750 MHz
Channels 2 4
Storage
Storage size 128 256 GB 128 256 GB
Storage type UFS 2.2 UFS 3.1
Memory card MicroSD No
Memory card max. size Up to 1024 GB -

Benchmarks

Geekbench 5 (Single-Core) Poco X4 Pro 5G 692 Poco F3 +46% 1010 Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core) Poco X4 Pro 5G 2078 Poco F3 +69% 3509 AnTuTu Benchmark 9 Poco X4 Pro 5G 405564 Poco F3 +73% 703522
CPU 124687 192076
GPU 99320 243072
Memory 68799 114835
UX 110873 147172
Total score 405564 703522
3DMark Wild Life Performance Poco X4 Pro 5G 1203 Poco F3 +256% 4282
Stability 99% 90%
Graphics test 7 FPS 25 FPS
Graphics score 1203 4282
PCMark 3.0 score 10064 11546
AnTuTu Benchmark 9 Android Smartphone Scores Sources: 3DMark [3] [4] ▶️ Submit your AnTuTu result

Software

Operating system Android 11 (Can be upgraded to Android 12) Android 11 (Can be upgraded to Android 12)
ROM MIUI 13 MIUI 13
OS size 26 GB 21 GB

Battery

Specifications
Capacity 5000 mAh 4520 mAh
Charge power 67 W 33 W
Battery type Li-Po Li-Po
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging No No
Reverse charging No No
Fast charging Yes (75% in 30 min) Yes (67% in 30 min)
Full charging time 0:49 hr 0:56 hr
Battery life tests
Web browsing 10:34 hr 11:06 hr
Watching video 13:33 hr 14:32 hr
Gaming 06:57 hr 05:39 hr
Standby 100 hr 83 hr
General battery life Poco X4 Pro 5G +3% 31:06 hr Poco F3 30:05 hr

Camera

Specs and camera test of smartphones
Main camera
Matrix 108 megapixels 48 megapixels
Image resolution 12032 x 9024 8000 x 6000
Zoom Digital Digital
Flash LED LED
Stabilization Digital Digital
8K video recording No No
4K video recording No Up to 30FPS
1080p video recording Up to 30FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 120 FPS (720p) 960 FPS (1080p)
Angle of widest lens 118° 119°
Lenses 3 (108 MP + 8 MP + 2 MP) 3 (48 MP + 8 MP + 5 MP)
Wide (main) lens - 108 MP - Aperture: f/1.9 - Focal length: 26 mm - Pixel size: 0.7 micron - Sensor: 1/1.52" Samsung S5KHM2 (ISOCELL Plus CMOS) - Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) - 48 MP - Aperture: f/1.8 - Focal length: 26 mm - Pixel size: 0.8 micron - Sensor: 1/2.0" Sony IMX582 (Exmor-RS CMOS) - Phase autofocus
Ultra-wide lens - 8 MP - Aperture: f/2.2 - Pixel size: 1.14 micron - Sensor: 1/2.8" Sony IMX355 (Exmor-RS CMOS) - 8 MP - Aperture: f/2.2 - Pixel size: 1.12 micron - Sensor: 1/4.0" Sony IMX355 (CMOS)
Macro lens - 2 MP - Aperture: f/2.4 - Pixel size: 1.75 micron - Sensor: 1/5" GalaxyCore GC02M1 (CMOS) - 5 MP - Focal length: 50 mm - Pixel size: 1.75 micron - Sensor: 1/5.0" Samsung S5K5E8 (CMOS) - Phase autofocus
Camera features - Bokeh mode - Pro mode - Bokeh mode - Pro mode
Selfie camera
Megapixels 16 megapixels 20 megapixels
Image resolution 4608 x 3456 4608 x 3456
Aperture f/2.5 f/2.45
Focal length - 26 mm
Pixel size 1 microns 0.8 microns
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/3.06" 1/3.4"
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS 1080p (Full HD) at 60 FPS

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.1 5.1
Bluetooth features LE A2DP LE HID A2DP
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG
GPS GPS GLONASS Beidou Galileo GPS GLONASS Beidou Galileo NAVIC
NFC* Depends on the region Yes
Infrared port Yes Yes
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* No No
Hybrid slot Yes No
LTE Cat* 18 20
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack Yes No
FM radio Yes No
Dolby Atmos Yes Yes
Speakers test Max. loudness Poco X4 Pro 5G 87.2 dB Poco F3 +3% 89.4 dB

Other

Category Mid-range Flagship
Announced February 2022 March 2021
Release date March 2022 March 2021
Sensors - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint
*Disclaimer! NFC GSM network support and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

After analyzing all the data we think that the Xiaomi Poco F3 is definitely a better buy.

Cast your vote

So which phone would you choose? Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G 115 (11.1%) Xiaomi Poco F3 921 (88.9%) Vote Total votes: 1036

Related comparisons

1. Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro and Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G 2. Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE and Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G 3. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G and Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G 4. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G and Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G 5. Xiaomi Poco F4 GT and Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G 6. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G and Xiaomi Poco F3 7. Xiaomi Poco F4 GT and Xiaomi Poco F3 8. Xiaomi Poco X4 GT and Xiaomi Poco F3

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below Name Message Send Send

source nanoreview.net


 Xiaomi introduced affordable flagships Mi 11X and Mi 11X Pro - powerful
Xiaomi introduced affordable flagships Mi 11X and Mi 11X Pro - powerful


The rise of the 400 smartphone you want how much for a flagship Ars
The rise of the 400 smartphone you want how much for a flagship Ars


 Xiaomi Verkocht 18 7 Miljoen Telefoons In 2013 - Androidics nl
Xiaomi Verkocht 18 7 Miljoen Telefoons In 2013 - Androidics nl


 Xiaomi Launches Online Portal - Investing co uk
Xiaomi Launches Online Portal - Investing co uk


 Xiaomi
Xiaomi


 Xiaomi Archives - Techkalauz
Xiaomi Archives - Techkalauz


 Xiaomi was officially removed from US Blacklist TechAlert24
Xiaomi was officially removed from US Blacklist TechAlert24


 XIAOMI - Quickmobile
XIAOMI - Quickmobile


 Xiaomi Mi 11 Wallpapers - Wallpaper Cave
Xiaomi Mi 11 Wallpapers - Wallpaper Cave


 XIAOMI
XIAOMI


Opaska Mi Band 5 - Xiaomi AZE Tech
Opaska Mi Band 5 - Xiaomi AZE Tech


Huawei Magazine Wallpaper 091 - 1440x2560
Huawei Magazine Wallpaper 091 - 1440x2560


Waves Phone Wallpaper 039 - 1080x2340
Waves Phone Wallpaper 039 - 1080x2340


Fall Phone Wallpaper - 008
Fall Phone Wallpaper - 008


Autumn Phone Wallpaper - 062
Autumn Phone Wallpaper - 062


Cloud Phone Wallpaper 1440x2560 - 014
Cloud Phone Wallpaper 1440x2560 - 014


Apple iPhone X Wallpapers HD
Apple iPhone X Wallpapers HD